We’re building a (green?) house, ed. 3: home site and design

NOTE: Updates of this post can be found at EcoMajority, my web-based forum focused on sustainable home building.

Once you decide you’re going to build a new house, the next question you face is multi-faceted, with long-term, far-reaching ramifications.  What kind of house are you going to build? How big should it be? Remodel, or all new construction? How should it sit on the site?

Big questions because if you don’t tear a building down, less goes into the landfill. And the bigger the house you build, the more materials that will be needed to go into it, and the more resources necessary to service it.  Where it’s located and how it’s positioned on the site will either allow you to make good use of the sun’s energy … or not.

The trend, of course, has been going in the wrong direction for the last couple of decades. I recently read a statistic that the average size for new home construction has grown by 20% over the last twenty years or so. I was shocked at that number — mostly because I couldn’t believe that the number wasn’t larger.  I walked through a home under construction recently that was probably just shy of 10,000 square feet. As I toured the home, I literally couldn’t imagine the purpose for the various rooms. Given the generosity of space, it was clear that Jon & Kate+8 (or Kate+8) weren’t moving in. I couldn’t help wondering how much the home would cost to heat in the winter, how much to repaint when the time came, and how much stuff you would need to fill a house of that size.  Eeesh.

Just to jump to the punchline, the house we are building adds up to just about 4000 square feet. It breaks down like this: our 4-bedroom house is 3100 square feet. Our art studio space and office space above and next to the garage add about another 900 square feet.  (It looks bigger in the wide angle pano shot).

A good sized house, no question about it. And a minor bone of contention as we worked with Lane Williams and Zeke Busch of Coop15 Architects. Lane is a big proponent economical and efficient use of space (check out the Coop15 blog posts on sustainable building). If I recall correctly, most of the home he designs are between 4000-5000 square feet — and trending downward. Given the technology boom in the NW and Microsoft wealth in our area, keeping custom-home sizes down has probably been a tough sell at times.

One of the question we lobbed back and forth was whether we really needed a guest room or not. We thought we did, and Lane politely questioned that. His solid reasoning was given the number of nights per year that you actually have guests, they could sleep in one of the kids’ bedrooms and our kids could double-up. Given that we’re on an island with ferry service, we wanted our guests not to feel rushed — and if they wanted to spend the night, that they would feel well accommodated. Though that may have added a 200+/- square feet, we felt strongly. So we have a guest room. But as we walk through the house (at this writing, nearly a month before move-in) a lot of the rooms seem on the small side. We are trusting our architect and believe that when we move in, we’ll have a Goldilocks moment and everything will feel just right. Lane has said that he’s never had a client come back to him 10 years later and tell him they wished the home were bigger — but he has had a number of clients who wish they’d been more restrained and built a smaller house.

Though we reused the existing foundation (for the part of the house that had a foundation) and the existing garage, there wasn’t much else that was usable for us. So we had to think about demolition and the filling of landfills — or deconstruction which takes significantly more time and, perhaps, more money. More on that in the next post.

Because we used the existing foundation, there were no choices to be made in regards to siting the house. It was what it was, which is one of the main reasons we bought where we did. Because of the western exposure, sun will help to warm the house significantly. And in the summer when the sun really beats through the windows, blinds and cross ventilization will help to keep things cool. Also critical to us was the fact that our site has unobstructed access to the southern sky — which means solar can be an option for us as well. More on that in another post as well.

Advertisements

3 Responses to We’re building a (green?) house, ed. 3: home site and design

  1. Art Funamori says:

    It’s all perspective I think… one of these days my condo will sell and I hope to be “movin’ on up”. My target is a house under 2000 sq ft. A home your size seems like an airplane hangar to me! Granted I have no kids left (or boomeranged) so my needs are less.

  2. Gavin Kelly says:

    HI,

    Great post – and congratulations on your new house.

    We are also in the middle of a remodel, though we have another 3-4 months to go. We are also working with Lane and Trevor at Coop15, and we have had similar discussions as you have. We are adding only 600sf to our relatively modest existing 1800sf northwest contemporary house on Queen Anne. You can see some pics on Trevor’s Flickr page here:

    2711 logo

    It is funny, but after we had framed out the house and we walked through the space, our reaction to one of the new bedrooms was “huh. Kinda small”. Just like you did. But when you think about it, western culture is so geared towards an assumption that bigger = better, and when you examine the real space needs for living, you really don’t need a lot of space to live comfortably. If you have spent any time in Japan or Korea, you can appreciate just how small a living space can be through better utilization. Working with Lane and understanding his philosophy has altered our own point of view and helped us appreciate the value of intimate spaces.

    I believe the latest statistics on house sizes indicate the first actual drop in square footage for the national average house size. But I would guess this is more the result of economic pressure than a cultural shift in attitudes towards house and space requirements.

    Anyway, best of luck with your new house. From what I can see it looks fab.

    – Gavin

  3. johnlivengood says:

    Looks like a pretty cool house, Gavin. I can see some similar framing details as our place. Coop 15 really does get the details right. And you are right about size of rooms. I remember Lane saying to us at one point hat he’s had a lot of clients come back to him at some point and tell him they wish the house were a little smaller, but none that have said they wish it were bigger. Probably true.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: